ProbioticstoPrimary Hyperoxaluria(moderate evidence)
    Condition
    Moderate Evidence
    Effectiveness 1/5

    Probiotics for Primary Hyperoxaluria

    Probiotics don't treat primary hyperoxaluria. Four placebo-controlled trials of an Oxalobacter formigenes product found no significant fall in urinary or plasma oxalate, and a meta-analysis of five trials agreed. Ordinary probiotics are untested here. Fluids, plus vitamin B6 and RNAi drugs in some or all type 1 patients, are the options with evidence.

    Overview

    Verdict

    Not supported

    No. The only probiotic tested in primary hyperoxaluria, Oxalobacter formigenes, did not lower urinary or plasma oxalate more than placebo, and ordinary probiotic supplements have not been tested in this condition.

    Probiotics have not been shown to help primary hyperoxaluria (PH), a rare inherited liver enzyme disorder in which the body makes too much oxalate. Researchers hoped Oxalobacter formigenes, a gut bacterium that lives on oxalate, could clear some of that excess through the gut, and tested it as an investigational freeze-dried capsule called Oxabact. In four double-blind, placebo-controlled trials lasting 8 to 52 weeks, it did not lower urinary or plasma oxalate significantly more than placebo (Hoppe 2011; Hoppe 2017; Milliner 2018; Ariceta 2023), and a 2025 meta-analysis of five randomised trials with 208 patients concluded it was ineffective (Khan 2025).

    The trials were small, because PH is rare, and all tested formulations of the same product, so a modest effect can't be fully ruled out: in the longest trial, plasma oxalate drifted down on Oxabact and up on placebo, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.064) (Ariceta 2023). Treatments that do lower oxalate exist. The RNA interference drug lumasiran cut urinary oxalate by 65.4% in PH type 1 (Garrelfs 2021). A probiotic is not a substitute for them.

    Who this page is for

    People with primary hyperoxaluria type 1, 2 or 3, and their families, who have read that an oxalate-eating gut bacterium might help. If you have ordinary calcium oxalate stones without a genetic cause, the page on probiotics for kidney stones covers that question.

    At a glance

    Verdict
    Doesn't work on current evidence
    Probiotic tested
    Oxalobacter formigenes (Oxabact), investigational
    Placebo-controlled trials
    4; none met its primary goal
    Meta-analysis (2025)
    5 RCTs, 208 patients; no effect on oxalate
    Longest trial
    52 weeks, 25 patients
    Shop probiotics (Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium)
    No trials in PH found
    Options with evidence
    Fluids, crystallisation inhibitors, vitamin B6 (some PH1), RNAi drugs (PH1), transplant

    How It Works

    The idea: pull oxalate out through the gut

    Oxalobacter formigenes relies solely on oxalate for growth (Daniel 2021). In PH the excess oxalate is made by the liver rather than eaten, so researchers hoped the bacterium would draw oxalate from the blood into the gut, where it could be broken down, and so lower the amount reaching the kidneys in urine (Milliner 2018).

    Getting it into the gut works. Stool counts of the bacterium rose significantly on treatment in an 8-week trial (p < 0.001) (Hoppe 2017), and it was established in the gut of treated patients after 52 weeks (Ariceta 2023). In an early 4-week pilot, by contrast, stool levels dropped as soon as dosing stopped, indicating only transient colonisation (Hoppe 2006).

    Why the mechanism hasn't translated, and what it can't tell you

    Colonising the gut did not translate into lower oxalate in the controlled trials (Hoppe 2017; Milliner 2018). A 2025 systematic review of probiotic trials for kidney stones reached the same conclusion: successful colonisation with O. formigenes did not bring meaningful biochemical improvements (Bhardwaj 2025).

    A 2026 review suggested why: across trials, probiotic success with oxalate depended less on dose, strain or persistence than on ecological context, especially how many oxalate-degrading genes a person's own gut microbes already carry, and efficacy was highest when that niche was vacant (Suryavanshi 2026). That idea is untested as a way to pick patients. A rising stool count is a laboratory marker, not evidence that kidneys are protected.

    Proposed mechanisms

    Uses oxalate as food
    Pulls oxalate into gut
    Less oxalate in urine

    Dosing & Protocol

    The dose that was studied

    There is no established probiotic dose for PH. Every placebo-controlled trial used a formulation of Oxabact, tested as an investigational product in phase 1 to 3 trials. In the 52-week trial, patients took one enteric-coated capsule of freeze-dried O. formigenes strain HC-1, containing at least a billion colony-forming units, twice daily with breakfast and dinner (Ariceta 2023). It still did not lower plasma oxalate significantly more than placebo.

    Probiotics sold as supplements mostly contain Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species, and a result for one microbe doesn't necessarily apply to another (NCCIH). We found no trial of these in people with PH. For lactic acid bacteria in ordinary stone formers, see probiotics for kidney stones.

    What the trials gave

    WhoDose and durationProductResult
    PH, GFR above 50 mL/min (42 patients)Dose not reported; 24 weeksOxabactNo difference in urinary oxalate vs placebo
    PH (28 patients)Dose not reported; 8 weeksOxabact OC5No difference in urinary or plasma oxalate
    PH (36 patients)Dose not reported; 24 weeksOxabact OC3No difference in urinary oxalate
    PH, eGFR below 90 (25 patients)1 capsule twice daily with food; 52 weeksOxabact (strain HC-1)Plasma oxalate difference not significant (p = 0.064)
    PH1 on dialysis (8 patients)1 capsule twice daily; 24 months reportedOxabact OC5Plasma oxalate reduced or not elevated vs baseline; no placebo

    From the trial reports; the first three summaries don't give the dose. None of these is a recommendation: the placebo-controlled trials were null.

    What to do instead

    1. 1

      Stay with your specialist team· Ongoing

      ERKNet and OxalEurope set out 48 practical statements on diagnosis and management of PH, covering conservative therapy, dialysis, transplantation and new therapies (Groothoff 2023).

    2. 2

      Keep up fluids and crystallisation inhibitors· Every day

      Supportive treatment for PH type 1 focuses on high fluid intake and crystallisation inhibitors (Gupta 2022).

    3. 3

      Ask whether vitamin B6 suits you (PH1)· A trial period set by your doctor

      People with specific PH1 genotypes can respond to pyridoxine, defined as a more than 30% fall in urinary oxalate (Gupta 2022).

    4. 4

      Ask about RNA interference drugs· As prescribed

      Lumasiran and nedosiran lowered urinary oxalate far more than placebo in PH1 (Garrelfs 2021; Baum 2023); nedosiran's trial showed no consistent effect in its small PH2 group (Baum 2023).

    5. 5

      Check before adding any probiotic· Before starting

      Especially after a liver or kidney transplant, when immunosuppressants raise the risk of infection from live microbes (NCCIH).

    If you already take a probiotic

    A probiotic taken for another reason is not oxalate treatment. Tell your kidney team about it, especially if you take immunosuppressants after a transplant, because live microbes carry more infection risk when immunity is weakened.

    Evidence

    The placebo-controlled trials: none met its main goal

    In 42 people with PH older than 5 years with a GFR above 50 mL/min, 24 weeks of Oxabact did not change urinary oxalate more than placebo: the change was under 20% and not different between groups (P = 0.616). An ad hoc analysis of 37 compliant patients found the oxalate-to-creatinine ratio fell 21% on Oxabact and 7% on placebo, still short of significance (P = 0.06) (Hoppe 2011). In an 8-week trial in 28 patients, neither urinary nor plasma oxalate changed differently from placebo (plasma, p = 0.438), and a post hoc analysis found urinary oxalate per creatinine actually rose on treatment (Hoppe 2017).

    A 24-week trial in 36 patients found no difference from placebo in urinary oxalate, plasma oxalate, stone events or the number of responders (Milliner 2018). The longest, ePHex, randomised 25 patients aged 2 or older with reduced kidney function (eGFR below 90 mL/min/1.73 m2) for 52 weeks. The treatment difference in plasma oxalate was -3.80 µmol/L (95% CI -7.83 to 0.23; p = 0.064), not significant, and kidney function stayed stable in both groups. Adjudicated kidney stone events were 7 in 13 patients on Oxabact and 8 in 12 on placebo (p = 0.12) (Ariceta 2023).

    The positive signals, and why they're weak

    In the 24-week trial, kidney function (eGFR) fell less on Oxabact than on placebo (a change of -2.71 vs -8.00; p = 0.01), and in people with eGFR below 90, plasma oxalate rose 3.25 µmol/L on placebo and fell 1.7 µmol/L on treatment (p = 0.13) (Milliner 2018). These were secondary results in a trial whose primary outcome was null, and the later 52-week trial found kidney function stable in both groups (Ariceta 2023).

    In an open-label study of people with PH type 1 on dialysis, 12 started and 8 continued; after 24 months all had reduced or non-elevated plasma oxalate compared with baseline, set against an untreated group drawn from past medical records rather than a placebo (Hoppe 2021). An early 4-week pilot without a control group reported 22-48% falls in urinary oxalate in 3 of 5 patients with normal kidney function on a paste form, and 38.5-92% falls in 4 of 6 on capsules (Hoppe 2006). Neither design can separate the bacterium's effect from chance or other care.

    What the pooled evidence says, and what's missing

    A 2025 meta-analysis of five randomised trials with 208 patients found no effect on plasma oxalate (P = 0.06) or urinary oxalate (mean difference -0.01 mmol/day; 95% CI -0.12 to 0.10; P = 0.86), with no excess of adverse events; the authors concluded O. formigenes was ineffective but called for more rigorous trials (Khan 2025).

    No trial has been long enough to show whether a probiotic changes kidney failure or systemic oxalosis. All the placebo-controlled trials tested formulations of one company's product, and the 52-week trial was designed, funded and managed by that company (Ariceta 2023). Meanwhile, newer drugs have strong randomised evidence: in PH type 1, 84% of patients on lumasiran reached normal or near-normal urinary oxalate at 6 months versus 0% on placebo (Garrelfs 2021), and 50% on nedosiran did so on at least two consecutive visits versus 0% on placebo in PH1 and PH2 combined, with the effect seen in PH1 and no consistent effect in PH2 (Baum 2023).

    Evidence scorecard

    Meta-analysis (2025)
    5 RCTs, 208 patients; no effect on plasma or urinary oxalate
    Placebo-controlled trials of Oxabact
    4 (8-52 weeks, 25-43 patients); all null on the primary outcome
    Kidney stone events (52-week trial)
    7 in 13 vs 8 in 12 on placebo; not significant
    Uncontrolled studies
    4-week pilot and 24-month dialysis study; positive, no placebo
    Ordinary probiotics in PH
    No trials found
    Product
    One manufacturer's O. formigenes in every placebo-controlled trial
    Funding
    52-week trial designed, funded and managed by the manufacturer

    Placebo-controlled trials, a meta-analysis and uncontrolled studies of Oxalobacter formigenes (Oxabact) in primary hyperoxaluria, including the null trials.

    A randomised Phase I/II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered Oxalobacter formigenes to treat primary hyperoxaluria

    Score: 6/10
    2017
    rct
    n=28

    Hoppe B, Niaudet P, Salomon R +4 more

    Treatment with OC5 did not significantly reduce Uox or Pox over 8 weeks of treatment

    View source

    Oxalobacter formigenes: a potential tool for the treatment of primary hyperoxaluria type 1

    Score: 3/10
    2006
    cohort
    n=16

    Hoppe B, Beck B, Gatter N +4 more

    indicating only transient gastrointestinal-tract colonization

    View source

    Efficacy and safety of Oxalobacter formigenes in patients with primary hyperoxaluria: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    Score: 7/10
    2025
    meta_analysis

    Khan U, Mubariz M, Rezq H +4 more

    O. formigenes was ineffective in reducing the serum and urine oxalate levels in patients with PH

    View source

    A randomised Phase II/III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered Oxalobacter formigenes to treat primary hyperoxaluria

    Score: 7/10
    2018
    rct
    n=36

    Milliner D, Hoppe B, Groothoff J

    OC3 treatment did not reduce urinary oxalate over 24 weeks of treatment compared with placebo

    View source

    ePHex: a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of Oxalobacter formigenes in patients with primary hyperoxaluria

    Score: 7/10
    2023
    rct
    n=25

    Ariceta G, Collard L, Abroug S +4 more

    there was no significant difference between groups in the primary outcome

    View source

    Efficacy and safety of Oxalobacter formigenes to reduce urinary oxalate in primary hyperoxaluria

    Score: 7/10
    2011
    rct
    n=42

    Hoppe B, Groothoff JW, Hulton SA +4 more

    The change in Uox was <20% and not different between groups

    View source

    Effects of Oxalobacter formigenes in subjects with primary hyperoxaluria Type 1 and end-stage renal disease: a Phase II study

    Score: 3/10
    2021
    cohort
    n=12

    Hoppe B, Pellikka PA, Dehmel B +3 more

    all subjects had reduced or non-elevated Pox compared with baseline

    View source

    Safety

    Tolerability and the real risks

    Oxabact was well tolerated in the trials: no serious adverse events were reported in the first placebo-controlled trial (Hoppe 2011), no safety issues in the 8-week trial (Hoppe 2017), and in the 52-week trial there were fewer adverse events on Oxabact (46 in 13 patients) than on placebo (61 in 11 patients) (Ariceta 2023). Pooled across five trials, adverse events were not more common than on placebo (odds ratio 0.44; 95% CI 0.14 to 1.39) (Khan 2025).

    Shop probiotics are a different matter. They have a long history of apparently safe use in healthy people, but few studies have examined their safety in detail; the risk of harm is greater in people with severe illness or a weakened immune system, the FDA has warned about severe infections in premature infants given probiotics, and some products contain microbes not listed on the label (NCCIH). That matters in PH because many patients eventually need a kidney or liver transplant (Michael 2024), with the necessary immunosuppression and its long-term risks (Gupta 2022).

    After a liver or kidney transplant

    Immunosuppressant medicines raise the risk of infection from live microbes in probiotics. The 52-week Oxalobacter trial excluded transplant recipients, and an early 4-week pilot included only one or two transplant patients, so there is almost no safety information for this group. Check with your transplant team before taking any probiotic.

    Check with your clinician first if you

    Had a transplant
    Take immunosuppressants
    Are seriously ill
    Have a premature baby

    Interactions & Conflicts

    Interactions between probiotics and medicines have been little studied (NCCIH). The practical issues are antibiotics, which can kill swallowed bacteria (the 52-week trial excluded people needing ongoing antibiotics to which O. formigenes is sensitive) (Ariceta 2023), immunosuppressants, which raise infection risk (NCCIH), and the risk of putting off proven care: NCCIH advises not using probiotics as a reason to postpone seeing a health care provider.

    Notable interactions

    Interacts withSeverityMechanismAction
    Antibiotics
    low
    Can kill swallowed bacteria such as O. formigenesTake prescribed antibiotics as directed; don't stop them for a probiotic
    Immunosuppressants (after liver or kidney transplant)
    moderate
    Higher risk of infection from live microorganismsUse a probiotic only with your transplant team's agreement
    Vitamin B6, lumasiran, nedosiran, fluids and crystallisation inhibitors
    low
    No oxalate benefit from the probiotic to replace themDon't stop or reduce prescribed treatment

    References

    1. Hoppe B, et al. Efficacy and safety of Oxalobacter formigenes to reduce urinary oxalate in primary hyperoxaluria. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(11):3609-15.DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr107
    2. Hoppe B, et al. A randomised Phase I/II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered Oxalobacter formigenes to treat primary hyperoxaluria. Pediatr Nephrol. 2017;32(5):781-790.DOI: 10.1007/s00467-016-3553-8
    3. Milliner D, et al. A randomised Phase II/III study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered Oxalobacter formigenes to treat primary hyperoxaluria. Urolithiasis. 2018;46(4):313-323.DOI: 10.1007/s00240-017-0998-6
    4. Ariceta G, et al. ePHex: a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of Oxalobacter formigenes in patients with primary hyperoxaluria. Pediatr Nephrol. 2023;38(2):403-415.DOI: 10.1007/s00467-022-05591-5
    5. Khan U, et al. Efficacy and safety of Oxalobacter formigenes in patients with primary hyperoxaluria: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Indian J Urol. 2025;41(1):11-19.DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_359_24
    6. Hoppe B, et al. Effects of Oxalobacter formigenes in subjects with primary hyperoxaluria Type 1 and end-stage renal disease: a Phase II study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021;36(8):1464-1473.DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa135
    7. Hoppe B, et al. Oxalobacter formigenes: a potential tool for the treatment of primary hyperoxaluria type 1. Kidney Int. 2006;70(7):1305-11.DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001707
    8. Daniel SL, et al. Forty Years of Oxalobacter formigenes, a Gutsy Oxalate-Degrading Specialist. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021;87(18):e0054421.DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00544-21
    9. Suryavanshi M, et al. Predicting probiotic success: lessons from Oxalobacter and oxalate metabolism. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2026;12(1):30.DOI: 10.1038/s41522-025-00896-3
    10. Bhardwaj M, et al. Probiotic and Synbiotic Interventions Targeting Oxalate-Degrading Gut Bacteria for the Prevention of Kidney Stones: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2025;17(12):e98728.DOI: 10.7759/cureus.98728
    11. Groothoff JW, et al. Clinical practice recommendations for primary hyperoxaluria: an expert consensus statement from ERKNet and OxalEurope. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2023;19(3):194-211.DOI: 10.1038/s41581-022-00661-1
    12. Michael M, et al. Diagnosis and management of primary hyperoxalurias: best practices. Pediatr Nephrol. 2024;39(11):3143-3155.DOI: 10.1007/s00467-024-06328-2
    13. Gupta A, et al. Treatment of primary hyperoxaluria type 1. Clin Kidney J. 2022;15(Suppl 1):i9-i13.DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfab232
    14. Garrelfs SF, et al. Lumasiran, an RNAi Therapeutic for Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(13):1216-1226.DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021712
    15. Baum MA, et al. PHYOX2: a pivotal randomized study of nedosiran in primary hyperoxaluria type 1 or 2. Kidney Int. 2023;103(1):207-217.DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.07.025
    16. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Probiotics: Usefulness and Safety. National Institutes of Health; updated August 2019.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Can probiotics lower oxalate in primary hyperoxaluria?
    Not on current evidence. Four placebo-controlled trials of an Oxalobacter formigenes product found no significant drop in urinary or plasma oxalate, and a 2025 meta-analysis of five trials with 208 patients concluded it was ineffective. No trial of ordinary shop probiotics in primary hyperoxaluria turned up in our search.
    What is Oxalobacter formigenes?
    It is a gut bacterium that relies solely on oxalate for growth. Because it breaks oxalate down, researchers hoped that swallowing it would pull oxalate out of the blood into the gut. In trials it did settle in the gut, but oxalate levels did not fall more than on placebo.
    Do ordinary probiotic supplements contain Oxalobacter?
    Most probiotic supplements contain Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium species, and results for one microbe don't necessarily apply to another. The Oxalobacter tested in primary hyperoxaluria was a specific strain in an investigational capsule called Oxabact, and even that did not beat placebo.
    Is there any group in which Oxalobacter looked more promising?
    In 8 people with primary hyperoxaluria type 1 on dialysis, plasma oxalate was reduced or not elevated after 24 months on Oxabact, but there was no placebo group. In the 52-week trial in people with reduced kidney function, plasma oxalate trended lower than on placebo without reaching significance (p = 0.064). These are leads for research, not reasons to take a probiotic.
    What does lower oxalate in primary hyperoxaluria?
    High fluid intake and crystallisation inhibitors are the supportive basics. Vitamin B6 can lower urinary oxalate by more than 30% in some people with specific type 1 genotypes, and in PH type 1 the RNA interference drugs lumasiran and nedosiran cut urinary oxalate sharply in placebo-controlled trials (nedosiran showed no consistent effect in the small PH2 group). Your specialist team decides which applies to you.
    Is it safe to take a probiotic if I have primary hyperoxaluria?
    Oxabact was well tolerated in the trials. Shop probiotics have a long record of apparently safe use in healthy people, but the risk of infection is higher with a weakened immune system, which matters after a liver or kidney transplant. Ask your transplant or kidney team first.

    Medical Disclaimer

    The information provided on this website is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition or before starting any supplement regimen.

    Individual results may vary. The statements on this website have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. Products and information are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.