Glutathione as a skin-lightening agent and in melasma: a systematic review
Sarkar R, et al.
Published in International Journal of Dermatology
Methodology
Systematic review of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library over the preceding 10 years for studies of glutathione as a skin-lightening agent and in melasma, with assessment of level of evidence, strength of recommendation and risk of bias across topical, oral and intravenous routes.
Key Findings
This review of ten years of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane literature found topical glutathione 0.5% significantly more effective than 0.1% and than placebo, with further improvement when combined with microneedling. Five randomised trials and one open-arm study of oral glutathione at 250 mg once or twice daily or 500 mg daily showed a significant reduction in melanin index versus placebo, and topical 2% plus oral glutathione outperformed either alone. Only one placebo-controlled study examined intravenous glutathione (37.5% vs 18.7% response, p = 0.054, not significant). Risk of bias was low in roughly half the studies and high in the rest, and the authors conclude intravenous glutathione is contraindicated for lack of efficacy and side effects, while topical and oral forms give moderate but unsustained lightening.
Conclusions
Topical and oral glutathione both provide moderately efficacious skin-lightening outcomes; intravenous glutathione is contraindicated due to lack of efficacy and side effects.
Limitations
About half the included studies were at high risk of bias, no meta-analysis was performed, effects do not persist after stopping, and the intravenous evidence rests on a single non-significant trial.
Supplements Studied
Topical versus oral glutathione both provide moderately efficacious skin-lightening outcomes... IV glutathione is contraindicated due to lack of efficacy and side effects.
Related Health Concerns
Study Details
Access Study
This information is for educational purposes only. Always consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement regimen.